Yearly Archive March 31, 2014

Taken by storm: responding to the impacts of climate change

http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Taken-by-storm-climate-change-report-march-2014.pdf
Christian Aid has published a new report detailing the devastating effects of  on some of the poorest communities around the world.
‘Taken by storm: responding to the impacts of climate change’ reveals the way in which developing countries including the Philippines, Brazil, Malawi and Bolivia are suffering the worst consequences, and underlines the need for world leaders to respond with urgency.
It calls for “decisive action to be taken at every opportunity” to combat the disastrous effects.
“Short-term adaptation is not enough. Structural change must come from binding commitments at a global level, and must happen now,” it says.
The report is introduced by Lord Williams, former Archbishop of Canterbury and current Chair of Christian Aid. He recalls the flooding that caused chaos in the UK at the beginning of this year, but notes that though it was highly disruptive and shocking for us in the West, “for millions of people around the world, living with this sense of fragility is nothing new”.
“Far from being a vague threat in the distant future, a warming world is very much a present reality,” he warns. “Stronger storm surges, heavier rain, and scarcer resources are part of what countless people across the world live with daily, with far fewer resources to deal with it than we have.
“It is essential for us to remember the specific human faces of those who suffer because of climate instability. Countless communities and families in every affected region of Africa, Latin America and Asia, people with needs and hopes and anxieties like ours, are already forced to cope with circumstances whose difficulty increases daily, and so with the prospect of an extremely bleak future for themselves and their children if nothing changes.”
The report shares stories of some of the individuals who are suffering as a result of what Lord Williams refers to as this “deep injustice”, as a reminder that there are real people suffering, though we are often blind to it in the West.
Marina Acaylan is one of millions who lost their homes in the devastating typhoon that wreaked havoc across the Philippines last year, killing thousands. She used to earn a living by selling homemade rice cakes at the local market, but can no longer do so because the marketplace was also swept away by the storm.
Kenyan farmers Lilian and Alberty Nthiga are finding it increasingly difficult to grow crops due to a lack of rainfall and thus struggle to make ends meet, while Carmen Quispe Dermarca is having to cope with similar difficulties in Bolivia, where the Illimani glacier is melting.
Although people throughout the developing world are continuing to strive to protect their livelihoods, and are finding ways to cope with changing climates, the report notes that “short-term adaptation is only a temporary fix”.
“The long-term solution will only be found when the global community addresses the root causes of climate change, and takes decisive steps to reduce emissions,” it states.
“There is no doubt that climate change is significantly hampering development work, compounding the many struggles faced by people already fighting to free themselves from poverty’s grip.”
Martin Vilela of Agua Sustentable, a charity working in partnership with Christian Aid in Bolivia to help those struggling with water shortages, says: “We can’t constantly be adapting. I think it’s important that the communities find immediate responses to the changes, but we can’t forget that this is a structural problem.
“[A] key area of our work is to show to the global community the reality of the communities…so they can realise that climate change is real and start to take action to find concrete responses at a global level.
“If this is not achieved, many indigenous peoples’ way of life will be destroyed permanently,” he warns.
Christian Aid’s Senior Climate Change Adviser and author of the report Dr Alison Doig has reiterated the importance of immediate action from the world’s leaders.
“People living on the front line of climate change are the canaries in the climate coalmine, but their plight is more than just a warning of what many other parts of the world can expect,” she said.
“These are individuals paying the price for the actions of wealthy nations and people grown rich through continued dependence on polluting fossil fuels.”
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is to publish its latest report on the impacts of climate change on Monday, which is expected to make clear the need for strong intervention.
“It is vital that politicians hear their voices and heed the warnings of the IPCC and make tackling climate change a priority if we are to pass on a safe planet fit for future generations,” Doig concludes.
“The world must act decisively and urgently to reduce emissions, manage resources and protect the vulnerable. In this way, and only this way, will we have the chance for a future that is sustainable and fair for the poorest people in the world.”

NAC Recommendations on Agriculture Extension

Recommendation 1:  Facilitate the development of a performance-linked and accountable extension process for the promotion of sustainable agriculture through India – Sustainable Agricultural Practices
Recommendation 2 Shift from a supply-driven to a demand-driven extension approach
Recommendation 3 Recognize and promote local knowledge and indigenous practices known to farmers – — Systems of  Rice Intensification (SRI) and similar intensification programme for other crops to be supported rigorously
Recommendation 4 Empower smallholder farmers through Group Approach and promote extension systems that work through groups of farmers. The Rural Development Ministry which implements mega programmes through mobilizing farmers into collectives needs to be treated at par with the Ministry of Agriculture in terms of its agriculture extension and be provided with technical backstopping by the ICAR in a like manner
Recommendation 5 Promote robust public-private partnership in agriculture extension and institute a Competitive Agriculture Extension Grant Fund Recommendation 6 Give Major Impetus to ATMA Reform
http://nac.nic.in/communication.php

Communications to Government

Letter date Subject Enclosures
28 Feb, 2014 Recommendations on “Welfare of Tea Plantations Labour” NAC Recommendations (244 KB) PDF will open in new window
28 Feb, 2014 Recommendations on “Innovative Agriculture Extension” NAC Recommendations (348 KB) PDF will open in new window
21 Feb, 2014 Recommendations on ‘Development of Cooperatives in India’ NAC Recommendations (234 KB) PDF will open in new window Executive Summary (201 KB) PDF will open in new window
21 Feb, 2014 Recommendations on ‘Development of Sports in North Eastern Region’ NAC Recommendations (227 KB) PDF will open in new window
03 Jan, 2014 Recommendations on ‘Occupational Health and Safety of Workers in India’. NAC Recommendations and Executive Summary (254 KB) PDF will open in new window
11 Nov, 2013 Recommendations on ‘Agroforestry’. NAC recommendation (174 KB) PDF will open in new window Executive Summary (1.15 MB) PDF will open in new window
04 Oct, 2013 Recommendations on ‘Skill Development of Functionaries in the Social Sector Programmes of the Government’. NAC recommendation and Summary of recommendations (3.98 MB) PDF will open in new window
13, Sep 2013 Third set of recommendations on ‘Reforming Fund Flow System for Flagship Programmes’. NAC recommendation and Summary of recommendations (1.22 MB) PDF will open in new window
16 Aug, 2013 Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) a) NAC recommendation (2.36 MB) PDF will open in new window b) Summary of recommendations (979 KB) PDF will open in new window
15 July, 2013 Reforms in Governance, Strengthening Institutional Capacities and Effective Implentation of Flagship Programmes a) Human Resource Strategies & Policies (197 KB) PDF will open in new window b) Mobilizing and Managing Knowledge Resources (197 KB) PDF will open in new window
08 July, 2013 Universal Health Coverage NAC Recommendations (2.29 MB) PDF will open in new window Summary of Recommendations (99.8 KB) PDF will open in new window
28, May 2013 Pre-Legislative Process NAC Recommendations (76.8 KB) PDF will open in new window
12, Mar 2013 Strengthening of Scheduled Castes & Schedules Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Rules, 1995 NAC Recommendations (224 KB) PDF will open in new window Summary of Recommendations (71.1 KB) PDF will open in new window
14, Feb 2013 Recommendations on RTE a) Towards ending discrimination in schools b) Monitoring, Accountability and Grievance Redress under RTE   a) Towards ending discrimination in schools (375 KB) PDF will open in new window b) Monitoring, Accountability and Grievance Redress under RTE (138 KB) PDF will open in new window Summary of NAC Recommendations (139 KB) PDF will open in new window
12, Feb 2013 Enhancing Farm Income for Small Holders through Market Integration NAC Recommendations (611 KB) PDF will open in new window Summary of NAC Recommendations (146 KB) PDF will open in new window
31, Dec 2012 Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act 1996 (PESA) NAC Recommendations (248 KB) PDF will open in new window
14, Dec 2012 Development of North Eastern Region NAC Recommendations (403 KB) PDF will open in new window
12, Dec 2012 Recommendations on Strengthening Right to Education NAC Recommendations (218 KB) PDF will open in new window
05, Nov 2012 Recommendations relating to Implementation Framework of Scheduled Caste Sub-Plan (SCSP) and Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) NAC Recommendations (357 KB) PDF will open in new window
05, June 2012 NAC recommendations for Improving the Sex Ratio at Birth NAC Recommendations (822 KB) PDF will open in new window Summary (207 KB) PDF will open in new window
31, May 2012 Recommendations on the proposed Disability Rights Legislation NAC Recommendations (205 KB) PDF will open in new window Summary of NAC Recommendations (115 KB) PDF will open in new window
16 May, 2012 Recommendations regarding De-notified, Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic Tribes NAC Recommendations (265 KB) PDF will open in new window Summary of NAC Recommendations (154 KB) PDF will open in new window
19, Apr 2012 Social Security for Unorganised Workers NAC Recommendations (923 KB) PDF will open in new window Summary of NAC Recommendations (299 KB) PDF will open in new window
14, Mar 2012 National Programme for shelters and other services for the urban homeless NAC Recommendations (77.5 KB) PDF will open in new window Explanatory Note (230 KB) PDF will open in new window
20, Dec 2011 Reforms proposed for the Rajiv Awas Yojana NAC Recommendations (211 KB) PDF will open in new window
20, Dec 2011 Reforming Scheduled Castes Sub-Plan (SCSP) / Tribal Sub Plan (TSP) NAC Recommendations (260 KB) PDF will open in new window
20, Dec 2011 Towards Inclusive Development to Empower Minorities NAC Recommendations for the 12th Plan (577 KB) PDF will open in new window
20, Dec 2011 Prohibition of Child Labour upto the age of 14 years NAC Recommendations (164 KB) PDF will open in new window
14, Sep 2011 Strengthening Natural Resource Management components under Mahatma Gandhi NREGA Recommendations of the NAC finalized in its meeting held on 28th July, 2011 (641 KB) PDF will open in new window
22, Jul 2011 Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Reparations) Bill, 2011 Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence(Access to Justice and Reparations) Bill, 2011 (1 MB) PDF will open in new window Explanatory Note (690 KB) PDF will open in new window
07, Jul 2011 National Food Security Bill, 2011 National Food Security Bill, 2011 (1.1 MB) PDF will open in new window
09, Jun 2011 Recommendations for effective implementation of Mahatma Gandhi NREGS NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 25th May, 2011 (18.1 KB) 
09, Jun 2011 Recommendations for Follow-up Measures to Eradicate Manual Scavenging NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 25 May, 2011 (386 KB) 
08, Jun 2011 Recommendations for a Central Law for Protection of Livelihood Rights and Social Security of Street Vendors NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 25 May, 2011 (263 KB) 
08, Jun 2011 Recommendations for a reformed and strengthened Integrated Child Development Services(ICDS) NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 25 May, 2011 (233 KB)  Summary of the NAC Recommendations on ICDS (80.6 KB) 
06, Jun 2011 Note of Recommendations on LA and R & R Bill NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 25 May, 2011 (491 KB) 
04, May 2011 Essential Elements of a National Policy for Domestic Workers NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 28th April, 2011 (79.4 KB) 
31, Mar 2011 Amendment to RTI Rules proposed by the Department of Personnel & Training NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 24th March, 2011 (91.4 KB) 
12, Mar 2011 Scheduled Tribes & Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 26 February 2011 (1.1 MB) 
02, Feb 2011 Inclusion of certain categories in BPL identification Recommendations of the NAC finalized in its meeting held on 21 January, 2011 (65.6 KB) 
14, Jan 2011 Protection of Women from Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Bill, 2010 NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 10 January 2011 (8.0 KB) 
09, November, 2010 Eradication of Manual Scavenging Resolution adopted by the NAC in its meeting held on 23 October, 2010 (137 KB) 
27th October, 2010 National Food Security Bill (NFSB) NAC Recommendations finalized in its meeting held on 23 October, 2010 (208 KB) 

YSRC Poll Promise: SHG loan waiver is impractical

YSRC Party has been promising loan waiver to DWRCA women self help groups immediately after coming to power.  In this regard we would like to bring to your kind notice that these promiseRs. 22,922.59 cr will be a burden on the budget of the total budget (Rs. 1,83,129.00 crores) proposed for the year 2014-15. The YSRC leader is also asking women self-help groups not to repay the loans as he would waive all of them when comes to power. This will also affect the credibility of women SHGs and effect their Credit worthiness.
 
Loans to DWRCA/Women Self Help Groups

  1. Total loans to Women SHGs in Andhra Pradesh are Rs. 22,922.59 crore.
Loans to Women SHGs In crore (as on 30th September, 2013)
Total out standing Rs. 21,245.19
Over dues Rs. 946.15
Non Performing Assets (NPAs) Rs.731.25
Total Rs. 22,922.59

http://www.slbcap.nic.in
The YSRC leader is also promised the waiver of loans to women self help groups and is asking them not to pay the loans in every meeting.

TDP poll promise: Farm Loan and Women SHG loan Waiver is impractical

Telugu Desam Party has been promising loan waiver to farmers and DWRCA women self help groups immediately after coming to power.  On 24th March, TDP leader has released the Manifesto for 2014 local body elections and promised to waive the loans of Farmers and SHG women.   These promises Rs. 90,146.87 crore (Rs. 67,224.28 cr of farm loans and Rs. 22,922.59 cr of Credit to Women Self Help Groups) will cost about 50% of the total budget (Rs. 1,83,129.00 crores) proposed for the year 2014-15.  While indebtedness among farmers itself is high, institutional credit to agriculture is only around 21%.  Most of the institutional credit only goes to land owners and not the real cultivators who take land on lease and cultivate. In this regard we feel that spending half of the budget to raise hopes and votes from many and finally helping only few is completely unjustified.
The TDP leader is also asking farmers and women self-help groups not to repay the loans as he would waive all of them when comes to power. This will also affect the credibility of the farmers and women SHGs and effect their Credit worthiness.
A.      On Farmers Loan Waiver

  1. The total loans to farmers planned during 2013-14 were Rs. 67,224.28 crore against which Rs. 38,491.65 crores were disbursed till 30th September, 2013. Rest would be distributed in the next during the rabi season (October, 2013 to March, 2014).

Agriculture Credit during 2013-14 (Rs. In Crores)

  Target 2013-14 Achieved till 30th sept 2013
Crop loans 49,988.69 28,820.19
Term loans 7217.50 6276.79
Agril allied loans 10018.08 3394.67
Total 67,224.28 38,491.65

Source: State Level Bankers Committee, http://www.slbcap.nic.in
If this target has to be met, the total budget requirement would be around
The loans are also not evenly or equitably distributed. Based on the data available the variations as follows. The region which is going to be formed as Andhra Pradesh (13 districts) had 61% of cultivated area while the total agriculture credit given till 30th September, 2013 is 69% whereas the state of Telangana which has 39% area got only 31% of the agricultural credit.
Regional Variation in Agriculture Credit (2013-14)

Region/New State 

Total Cropped area

Total Agriculture Credit

in ha

% to total

Target

% to total

Achieved*

% to total

Andhra Pradesh

7662000

61%

47016.95

70%

26486.21

69%

Telangana

4899001

39%

20207.33

30%

12005.44

31%

Total

12561001

100%

67224.28

100%

38491.65

100%

* till 30th September, 2013
Variations are also seen between districts within the two going to be formed states. For example in the 13 districts which are going to be formed as Andhra Pradesh the distribution is as follows. The four districts of Krishna, Guntur, East and West Godavari districts which have only 36% of the cultivated area got about 50% of agriculture credit.  Some people will get undue advantage compared to others.  The details of others districts is given in the annexure.
Regional variation within the newly forming state of Andhra Pradesh (2013-14)

Districts % cultivated area % agril credit target % agril credit achieved
Utterandhra: Srikakulam+Vijayanagaram+Vishaka patnam

14%

11%

9%

Coastal: Krishna+ E& W. Godavari+Guntur

36%

50%

49%

Coastal: Prakasham+ Nellore

14%

14%

11%

Rayalaseema: Chittor+Kadapa+Ananthpur+Kurnool

36%

26%

31%

 
The data of 2012-13 (annexure A) also showed the same trend.

  1. The access to institutional credit is as low as 21% in the combined state of Andhra Pradesh. The government estimation is that the state has 40 lakh tenant farmers and they do not have access to institutional credit. AP government has enacted Loan Eligibility Card scheme Act which identifies Tenant Farmers and issues Identity card which can be used to get access to credit. During 2013-14 only 4.43 lakh cards were issued and among them only 20% of them got access to crop loans. Rest of the farmers had to depend on the private loans at higher rates.
  2. Before going for 2009 elections the UPA government throughAgricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme (ADWDRS), 2008 has waived about Rs. 52,000 crores across the country.  In AP, the total number of farmers who benefited from the scheme was 77,55,227 and the total loan waiver and relief given to them was Rs 11,353.75 crore.  CAG found that in AP, a sum of Rs 40.76 lakh went to ineligible beneficiaries (132 accounts) and reimbursement was made for an amount of Rs 26.55 lakh though loans had not been disbursed (96 accounts).

B. Loans to DWRCA/Women Self Help Groups

  1. Total loans to Women SHGs in Andhra Pradesh are Rs. 22,922.59 crore.
Loans to Women SHGs In crore (as on 30th September, 2013)
Total out standing Rs. 21,245.19
Over dues Rs. 946.15
Non Performing Assets (NPAs) Rs.731.25
Total Rs. 22,922.59

http://www.slbcap.nic.in
The TDP leader also promised the waiver of loans to women self help groups and is asking them not to pay the loans in every meeting.
TDP should make clear
a. Whose loans and what loans will waived.   Otherwise many farmers are now not paying their dues and at the end they all end up in problems.
b. what would be the quantum of loans that would be waived and what is the source of the resources.
Annexure A

The Agriculture Credit Target and Disbursed during 2012-13

Districts Net cropped area % to total Target Disbursed % of achivement % to total

1

Srikakulam

405000

3%

1003.27

1297.49

129.33%

3%

2

Vijayanagaram

373000

3%

650.85

976.44

150.03%

2%

3

Vishakapatnam

315000

3%

666.71

1257.18

188.56%

3%

4

East godavari

598000

5%

2862.44

5089.93

177.82%

10%

5

West godavari

618000

5%

3074.45

5157.56

167.76%

10%

6

Krishna

716000

6%

2178.14

2975.34

136.60%

6%

7

Guntur

796000

6%

3660.46

4597.55

125.60%

9%

8

Prakasham

628000

5%

2039.86

2940.49

144.15%

6%

9

Nellore

429000

3%

1418.68

2316.99

163.32%

5%

10

Chittor

404000

3%

1767.24

2360.35

133.56%

5%

11

Kadapa

473000

4%

1656.70

2056.82

124.15%

4%

12

Anantapur

901000

7%

2476.06

2704.79

109.24%

5%

13

Kurnool

1006000

8%

2049.00

2361.68

115.26%

5%

14

Mahaboobnagar

917000

8%

1980.00

1061.92

53.63%

2%

15

Medak

554000

4%

945.00

1474.03

155.98%

3%

16

Nizamabad

420000

3%

1668.00

1255.41

75.26%

3%

17

Adilabad

634000

5%

920.00

2046.19

222.41%

4%

18

Karimnagar

563000

4%

1688.00

2046.19

121.22%

4%

19

Warangal

557000

4%

1345.00

1436.43

106.80%

3%

20

Khammam

439000

3%

1055.77

1514.07

143.41%

3%

21

Nalgonda

585000

5%

1351.38

1684.31

124.64%

3%

22

Ranga reddy

230000

2%

669.47

1059.62

158.28%

2%

23

Hyderabad

100%

0%

1.30

434.42

33416.77%

1%

Total

12561001

101%

37127.78

50105.2

134.95%

 

Total Agriculture credit to Farmers during 2013-14

Name of the District 

Total Cropped area

Crop Loans (Rs. In Crore)

Agrl.Term Loans (Rs. In Crore)

Agrl.Allied (Rs. In Crore)

 

Total Agriculture loans (Rs. In Crore)

 

in ha

%

Target

achieved

% to total

Target

Achieved

% to total

Target

Achieved

% to total

Target

% to total

achieved

% to total

Andhra Pradesh

1

Srikakulam

405000.00

5%

1435.80

819.44

4%

495.74

129.21

4%

132.42

60.09

3%

2063.96

4%

1008.74

4%

2

Vizianagaram

373000.00

5%

1000.00

370.00

2%

180.00

60.05

2%

350.00

141.45

6%

1530.00

3%

571.50

2%

3

Visakhapatnam

315000.00

4%

800.10

699.33

3%

452.50

128.03

3%

160.29

70.58

3%

1412.89

3%

897.94

3%

4

East Godavari

598000.00

8%

4765.73

2356.78

11%

463.81

510.64

14%

1224.98

234.70

10%

6454.53

14%

3102.12

12%

5

West Godavari

618000.00

8%

4374.08

3025.54

15%

411.90

353.71

10%

1452.05

157.67

7%

6238.04

13%

3536.92

13%

6

Krishna

716000.00

9%

3049.39

2026.06

10%

453.80

260.75

7%

728.65

304.13

13%

4231.84

9%

2590.94

10%

7

Guntur

796000.00

10%

5191.61

2649.77

13%

210.71

579.90

16%

980.70

443.06

20%

6383.01

14%

3672.73

14%

8

Prakasam

628000.00

8%

2600.32

1241.90

6%

747.38

319.68

9%

66.42

23.91

1%

3414.13

7%

1585.49

6%

9

Nellore

429000.00

6%

2402.84

893.45

4%

142.01

262.35

7%

460.38

144.63

6%

3005.22

6%

1300.43

5%

10

Chittoor

404000.00

5%

2044.87

1597.00

8%

109.99

168.29

5%

577.60

395.22

17%

2732.46

6%

2160.51

8%

11

Kadapa

473000.00

6%

2004.60

1260.11

6%

253.90

605.92

16%

563.20

47.03

2%

2821.70

6%

1913.06

7%

12

Ananthapur

901000.00

12%

3127.31

2085.56

10%

290.49

84.19

2%

123.38

144.08

6%

3541.17

8%

2313.83

9%

13

Kurnool

1006000.00

13%

2752.00

1505.00

7%

189.00

228.45

6%

247.00

98.55

4%

3188.00

7%

1832.00

7%

 

Total

7662000.00

100%

35548.65

20529.94

 

4401.23

3691.17

 

7067.07

2265.1

 

47016.95

 

26486.21

 
Telangana

1

Mahabubnagar

917000.00

19%

2405.70

1120.16

14%

452.01

298.07

12%

137.00

104.13

9%

2994.71

15%

1522.36

13%

2

Medak

554000.00

11%

1134.00

740.19

9%

198.00

203.85

8%

126.00

91.21

8%

1458.00

7%

1035.25

9%

3

Nizamabad

420000.00

9%

1921.00

950.25

11%

482.00

210.08

8%

708.00

89.86

8%

3111.00

15%

1250.19

10%

4

Adilabad

634000.00

13%

1656.50

704.05

8%

114.33

30.00

1%

19.79

24.82

2%

1790.62

9%

758.87

6%

5

Karimnagar

563000.00

11%

1772.40

1033.33

12%

473.26

411.31

16%

267.91

177.95

16%

2513.57

12%

1622.59

14%

6

Warangal

557000.00

11%

1800.00

985.31

12%

210.00

71.15

3%

280.00

74.13

7%

2290.00

11%

1130.59

9%

7

Khammam

439000.00

9%

1598.34

1020.99

12%

192.15

205.05

8%

997.79

279.64

25%

2788.28

14%

1505.68

13%

8

Nalgonda

585000.00

12%

1445.41

778.92

9%

456.84

322.83

12%

114.92

78.09

7%

2017.17

10%

1179.84

10%

9

Ranga Reddy

230000.00

5%

706.70

765.86

9%

237.68

229.05

9%

299.60

135.66

12%

1243.98

6%

1130.57

9%

10

Hyderabad

1.00

0%

0.00

191.19

2%

0.00

604.23

23%

0.00

74.08

7%

0.00

0%

869.50

7%

TOTAL

4899001.00

 

14440.05

8290.25

 

2816.27

2585.62

 

2951.01

1129.57

 

20207.33

 

12005.44

 

Andhra Pradesh

7662000.00

61%

35548.65

20529.94

71%

4401.23

3691.17

59%

7067.07

2265.10

67%

47016.95

70%

26486.21

69%

Telangana

4899001.00

39%

14440.05

8290.25

29%

2816.27

2585.62

41%

2951.01

1129.57

33%

20207.33

30%

12005.44

31%

Total

12561001.00

 

49988.70

28820.19

7217.50

6276.79

10018.08

3394.67

67224.28

38491.65

 
http://www.slbcap.nic.in

తెలంగాణా వ్యవసాయ సమాజం ఏమి కోరుకుంటోంది?

140325 తెలంగాణా రైతుల ఎజెండా 2014
140325 Telangana Agriculture notes
తెలంగాణా వ్యవసాయ పునర్నిర్మాణం కోసం  2014 ఎన్నికలలో రైతుల ఎజెండా
రైతు స్వరాజ్య వేదిక మరియు తెలంగాణా విద్యావంతుల వేదిక నిర్వహించిన సమావేశం లో నోట్స్

Effect of Different Nutrient Management Options on Rice under System Method of Cultivation – A review

Author(s): P.  Rajitha and K.I. Reddy | International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences | January – March 2014
Rice (Oryza sativa (L.)) is one of the most important stable food crops in the world. In Asia, more than two billion people are getting 60-70 per cent of their energy requirement from rice and its derived products. In India, rice occupies an area of 44 million hectare with an average production of 90 million tonnes with productivity of 2.0 tonnes per hectare. Demand for rice is growing every year and it is estimated that in 2010 and 2025 AD the requirement would be 100 and 140 million tonnes respectively. To sustain present food self-sufficiency and to meet future food requirements, India has to increase its rice productivity by 3 per cent per annum [21]. Rice cultivation requires large quantity of water and for producing one kg rice, about 3000 – 5000 litres of water depending on the different rice cultivation methods such as transplanted rice, direct sown rice (wet seeded), alternate wetting and drying method (AWD), system of rice intensification (SRI) and aerobic rice. Owing to increasing water scarcity, a shifting trend towards less water demanding crops against rice is noticed in most part of the India and this warrants alternate methods of rice cultivation that aims at higher water and crop productivity. There are evidences that cultivation of rice through system of rice intensification (SRI) can increase rice yields by two to three fold compared to current yield levels.
Download link: http://www.ijpaes.com/admin/php/uploads/447_pdf.pdf

Low Economic Efficiency of Irrigation Water Resource in Krishna Western Delta of Andhra Pradesh Demanding Water Management Interventions

Low Economic Efficiency of Irrigation Water Resource in Krishna Western Delta of Andhra Pradesh Demanding Water Management Interventions
Author(s): Dr. A. Siva Sankar, Dr. B. Ravindra Reddy and N. Nirmal Ravi Kumar, Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary | February 2014
The story of food security in the 21st century in India is likely to be closely linked to the story of water security. Today, the water resource is under severe threat. The past experiences in India indicated inappropriate management of irrigation has led to severe problems. Considering the importance of irrigation water resource efficiency, Krishna Western Delta (KWD) of Andhra Pradesh was purposively selected for this in depth study, as the farming community in this area are severely affected due to severe soil salinity and water logging problems and hence, adoption of different water saving crop production technologies deserve special mention. It is quite disappointing that, canals, tube wells and filter points and other wells could not contribute much to the irrigated area in KWD. Due to fewer contributions from these sources, the net area irrigated also showed declining growth at a rate of –3.98 per cent. Chilly is the most profitable crop cultivated in KWD. Regarding paddy, it was highest for System of Rice Intensification (SRI) technology (1.16) than semi-dry and transplanted technologies. The reduction in irrigation cost in SRI and semi-dry paddy production technologies is significant, as indicated by the decline to a tune of 45 and 55 percents respectively over transplanted technology. This clearly indicates that, by less water usage, paddy returns can be boosted by adopting SRI and semi-dry production technologies. Both the system-level and field-level interventions should be addressed to solve the issues / problems of water management. The environment in the State of Andhra Pradesh in general and in KWD in particular, with reference to the execution of water management aspects is congenial for planning various technological interventions. The enabling environment, institutional roles and functions and management instruments are posing favourable picture for executing the water management interventions in KWD. This facilitates the farming community to harvest good crop per unit of water resource used in the production programme.
Download link: http://www.jiarm.com/Feb2014/paper10642.pdf

‘Climate Smart’ Farms Key To Feeding The World

http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethhoffman/2014/02/07/climate-smart-farms-key-to-feeding-the-world/
A family in Orissa, India plants 'climate smart' rice using a System of Rice Intensification. Photo by Beth Hoffman.
A family in Orissa, India plants ‘climate smart’ rice using a System of Rice Intensification. Photo by Beth Hoffman.
The bad news is that it looks like climate change is here to stay.  The good news is that there are a number of cost effective, sustainable methods farmers can adopt immediately to lessen the blow.
I talked with Sonja Vermeulen, Head of Research for the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security about what farmers can do in the face of a changing climate. [See “With Climate Change, What’s Better For The Farm Is Better For The Planet” for more information and a related graphic].
Beth Hoffman: Can you summarize – What are some of the main “take aways” from the data CGIAR has collected over the years regarding climate adaptation and mitigation for farmers?  If you were going to relate just a few things that were most important, what would you tell people?
Sonja Vermeulen: One of the key messages is that there are potential triple wins – for adaptation, mitigation and food security – which is increasingly being called “climate smart agriculture.”
A simple example is, if a farmer increased the organic matter in their soil, that increases the carbon storage – a mitigation function – but more organic matter also means better water capacity.  So that means you are much better able to deal with delayed onset of rains or dry spells, which are the kinds of problems farmers are dealing with under climate change.  The increased organic content would also raise the fertility of the soil which would also be better for yields and for food security.
There are also many things that farmers can do on their own, by themselves, soon, like increasing the diversity of what they’ve got planted, or changing the planting dates and what they feed to animals.  That’s very good within near term.
But for longer term climate change on a wider scale, we need bigger actions – what people are calling “transformative adaptation.”  An example would be that coffee systems are extremely sensitive to temperature, and science is predicting that in countries like Nicaragua and Colombia as soon as 2030 farmers might lose up to 50% of their growing area or more.  So there you need much bigger adaptation actions – farmers would have to move out of coffee and into a different crop and coffee companies would need to change where they are sourcing their beans.
It is also important to note that there is also a lot that government policies and companies can do to help.  For example, farmers often need support in order to make changes.  Sometimes that is with direct investment, as we can see with the example of mangrove improvements or improving infrastructure. Access to better roads or inputs, for example, can really help farmers, particularly in developing nations.
Policy changes too,  like promoting agroforestry, can also make a big difference.  In Niger, for example, over 5 million hectares – an additional 20 million trees – have been planted by farmers themselves on their own farms.  What allowed that to happen, among other things, was a simple change in law that allowed farmers to have a resource ownership over the trees, whereas before it was owned by the Forest Department and there wasn’t much incentive to plant trees.  So this simple change in policy at a national level allowed this huge scale to be reached and farmers reaped the benefits of that.
BH: It strikes me that most of the techniques CCAFS talks about are very “low tech” – mixing cropping systems, rotating crops and livestock, using wild plant varieties, etc.  Is it true that many of the solutions CCAFS found to help in the face of climate change are not high tech?
Certainly in terms of moving quickly and effectively on adaptation in low resource, small holder, developing countries, the largest gains are with fairly low tech, established technologies. Many of those practices have been used for decades, if not centuries.  For example, digging terraces to manage erosion and making sure there are buffers of mangroves – these are things we already knew about.
But in some cases there are new techniques, like alternate wetting and drying of rice fields.  In 2005, farmers and researchers learned that if you drain rice fields periodically, and re-wet, farmers can get a lot of savings in irrigation and energy costs.  A side benefit was that it also lowers methane emissions from rice (rice fields are one of biggest methane emitters).  A great additional win was higher yields.  There are also very high tech, more sophisticated farming methods that can help, like micro dosing – pumping in exactly the right amount water and nutrients directly to the roots.
For the most part, the “new” technologies specific to climate are focused on – how can we predict patterns better and communicate that information effectively to farmers?   Farmers – particularly in poorer countries – are very widely dispersed and may not have high literacy.  And so we need to do a lot of work to get farmers better climate information so they can make better decisions on a day by day, year by year basis.
Thinking about the future of food security and feeding the 9 billion under climate change doesn’t just require attention to how much food we are producing.  There are also trade barriers, rising food prices, and distribution which are also issues.  Can we also find better ways to distribute and waste less food?  An FAO report last September found we throw away 1/3 of food, and so solving consumption patterns is also part of the puzzle.
BH: What makes these methods “sustainable”?  How are you using the term?
A big theme that is emerging is an idea of sustainable intensification.
The idea here is that one of the biggest impacts farming has on greenhouse gas emissions – but also on biodiversity – is its impact on forest clearance.  It actually makes more sense to grow more on smaller area – even if that means using more inputs like fertilizer – so as long as what you do at the same time is leave a larger area of forest.  You need to think at the landscape level when you are thinking about if what is going on on the farm is sustainable or not.
That said, we also want to think about what can be done to increase yields on smaller areas while increasing inputs as little as possible.  You want to not use more fertilizer, not to use more energy, but in some cases you will have to do a little of that, especially in very low input systems in Africa where they use less than 5% of fertilizer levels used in Asia for instance.
And so we might see things which have not traditionally counted as “sustainable” or “ecolological” in this case considered good practice, as long as it saves forests.  What we are saying is what we don’t have a vision of absolute perfection, where we want every farm to be self contained with internal recycling on farm – we just don’t think that is achievable.  But we do think that almost any farming system in world can improve its sustainability.  They can all improve their environmental management.
Advanced economies have made huge gains here as well.  Between 1990-2010, Denmark decreased its agricultural emissions by 20 percent, with no loss whatsoever in profitability.  So there is enormous scope in becoming more sustainable in almost any farming system.
Sustainability also needs to take into account the whole food chain.  For example, you might argue that finding ways to grow tobacco or a similar crop with less fertilizer would be really good.  But at a larger scale you may say – maybe that is not really the best use of our agricultural land, and in fact the best thing we can do for sustainability is to grow something else.  Tobacco is particularly unpopular now around the world, but that would also apply to the amount of meat we produce or dairy.  You would need to weigh the benefits as compared to more plant based diets.

Mr. Prime Minister – You are wrong. GM crops are dangerous, and there is sound scientific evidence. says Coalition for GM Free India

Mr. Prime Minister – You are wrong. GM crops are dangerous, and there is sound scientific evidence. says Coalition for GM Free India

Coalition challenges the PM to prove that concerns about Bt Crops are prejudiced.

New Delhi, 4th Feb, 2014: Reacting to the promotional statement on Genetically Modified (GM) crops by the Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in his inaugural address at the Indian Science Congress which started in Jammu yesterday [1], the Coalition for a GM Free India stated that the Prime Minister is wrong and wilfully misleading the nation on the issue of genetically modified (GM) crops.

The statement by the PM that the nation “should not succumb to unscientific prejudices against Bt crop” comes at a time when there is a growing body of scientific evidence on the adverse impacts of GM crops on human health, environment and farm livelihoods. The Coalition had recently released a compilation of more than 400 abstracts of peer reviewed scientific papers that points to the various adverse impacts from GM crops [2].

The Final Report of the Technical Expert Committee (TEC) set up by the Supreme Court of India in a PIL against open releases of GMOs into the environment has pointed to the inherent risks associated with GM crops and the absolute failure of the Indian regulatory system on GM crops. The TEC comprised of eminent scientists from the fields of molecular biology, toxicology, biodiversity, nutrition science etc had recommended against any open release of GM crops including for experimental trials, until a robust regulatory system is put in place. This was followed by more than 250 eminent Indian scientists including Padma awardees and 11 current and former Vice chancellors, writing to the Prime Minister about the serious concerns on GM crops[3]. They demanded that the Government of India stay clear of any vested interests and accept the recommendations of the TEC Final report as it is based on sound science, principles of sustainability and intergenerational justice.

Challenging the PM to prove his point that concerns about Bt Crops (GM crops with  toxin genes from the soil bacteria Bacillus thuringenesis) are unscientific and prejudiced, the coalition also reminded that it was his own Government had agreed to serious lacunae in the biosafety studies related to Bt Brinjal, the first GM food crop that came up for commercialisation and had put it under an indefinite moratorium. The Coalition for GM Free India demands Dr Manmohan Singh and his government to stop peddling risky GM crops and stand by the side of sound science and people of India.

Notes to the editor

1. The Prime Minister’s inaugural speech at the Indian Science Congress can be accessed at

http://pib.nic.in/newsite/pmreleases.aspx?mincode=3

2. The 2nd edition of the scientific compilation on adverse impacts of GM crops can be accessed at http://indiagminfo.org/?p=657

3. The letter to PM on concerns with GM crops by Indian Scientists can be accessed at http://indiagminfo.org/?p=654

For more info:

Rajesh Krishnan, Convenor, Coalition for GM Free India,

Mob: 09845650032 , email: rajeshecologist@gmail.com

Coalition for a GM-free India 

Website: www.indiagminfo.org, email : indiagmfree@gmail.com,  Facebook page – GM Watch India